客舱登机门把手不在槽内

737-SL-52-054

自有案例,机队中偶有反映,波音在2011年发布的737-SL-52-054中有说明,若手柄盒中的封圈(ITEM 115)未正确安装到位,当飞机起飞后,客舱内外压差气流将手柄(ITEM 35)推出, 受到外部气流的影响,导致手柄转动90度,无法入槽。

从机队案例来看,地面检查手柄复位正常,弹簧力正常,且后续运行中也未再出现外部手柄脱出的情况。结合厂家信息,分析可能性有二:

1、是由于在舱门开关过程中,出现了偶发的封圈密封不好,气流推出导致外部手柄脱出,完成重新开关舱门后恢复正常。

2、如果单单靠外部手柄弹簧力自动回弹,一定程度上不一定能完全啮合,需要往内推,使其到位。这是日常门开关过程中比较容易忽略的,典型的日常开门后未完全推入槽内的图片如下所示。

安全分析: 从波音分析来看,外部手柄脱出对飞行安全无影响。因为手柄不会移动到衔接锁机构的位置,不会导致舱门解锁和打开

就此向波音进一步询问更多可能性。波音结合其他运营商的报告,认为可能的原因有:

1.手柄机构中缺少O形环(M83461/1-212 O形环)。从把手盘上的孔向内看,看看O形圈是否在凹槽中(从门的内侧看不到,因为有轴承挡住了去路)。如果O形环在凹槽中并且没有损坏,那么下一步将是拆解手柄轴并检查弹簧是否损坏或无力。注意:如果O形环没有正确地放入凹槽中,那么在拆卸轴时,它很可能会脱落。

b.气缸端盖的固定弹簧销缺失。弹簧销P/N为MS39086-111。详见149A6109组件。

c.内部弹簧故障(弹簧断裂或薄弱)。这种情况很少见。由于弹簧用于压缩,如果弹簧断裂,剩余的弹簧仍会将手柄推向收起位置。然而,由于弹簧压缩力的损失,手柄会变得松动。手柄可以手动收起,但不想停留在那里,就像弹簧是一体的。外部把手凹槽弹簧的P/N为63-2848。

d.机组在飞行前没有正确收起手柄。手柄并非设计为可自行收起。弹簧设计用于将其保持在收起位置。

因为弹簧或销钉缺失,是稳定的故障表现,如果检查弹力正常,且后面故障不再现,最大的可能性就是封圈在转动过程中间歇性不能完全密闭。但在后续的作动中得到了恢复。

Boeing has received reports from other operators experienced the same condition, which led to the issuance of Ref /B/ Service Letters to address this condition. Possible causes are:

a. O-ring missing in handle mechanism (M83461/1-212 O-ring). Look inside through the hole in the handle pan to see if the O-ring is in the groove (you can’t see it from the inside of the door because there is a bearing in the way). If the O-ring is in the groove and not damaged, then the next step would be to disassemble the handle shaft and check the spring for damage or weakness. Note: If the O-ring wasn’t properly in the groove, it will most likely fall out when the shaft is removed.

b. A retaining spring pin for the cylinder end cap missing. The spring pin P/N is MS39086-111. See 149A6109 assy for details.

c. Internal spring failure (broken or weak spring). This condition is rare. Since spring is used in compression, if the spring was to have broken, the remaining spring would still push the handle towards the stowed position. However, the handle would get loose because of the lost spring compression. The handle would be able to be manually stowed, but would not want to stay there, like a spring is in one piece. P/N for Exterior Handle Recess Spring is 63-2848.

d. Operator did not stow the handle properly before flight. The handle is not designed to be self-stowing. The spring is designed to keep it in the stowed position.

2023年6月补充案例

有飞机连续发生不在槽内的情况,几乎每段都出现。安排拆开,检查发现封圈缺失,存在漏装的情况。

一号风挡温度传感器转换

引用自网络,针对一线不了解一号风挡的温度传感器切换方法,特做说明。

对于老构型的WHCU:E4电子架上有1号风挡的主备用传感器的跳线电门,尝试打到备用位,完成对应侧风挡加温测试,观察故障是否消失;对串前风挡WHCU和侧风挡的WHCU,观察故障是否转移。1#风挡跳线电门位置:电子舱E4架。

对于新构型的WHCU:计算机改装了自带1#风挡跳线功能。针对1#风挡的2个模式:

正常模式:

将风挡加温电门重置之后两个温度传感器可以交替使用,但一个传感器失效后,驾驶舱的OVERHEAT灯将点亮,此时将风挡电门置于OFF位,再置于ON位及完成了传感器的转换,OVERHEAT灯将熄灭。但是再次开关电门后WHCU仍然会选择到故障的传感器,导致OVERHEAT灯再次点亮。

超控模式:

在此模式下,WHCU面板上的绿色超控灯将点亮。当一个传感器失效后,此模式下WHCU可以自动选择到正常的传感器下工作。不随加温电门的开关循环而改变。只有当2个传感器均失效时,才会点亮驾驶舱的OVERHEAT灯。

因此,当一个传感器失效后,需将WHCU设置到超控模式来稳定的使用另一传感器。

  1#风挡主备用传感器模式切换:同时按住LAMP TEST+BIT VERFY三秒钟

点评:对于新构型,如现象不稳定,建议使用电门开关进行转换。仅在某一传感器稳定失效时,执行超控。

氧气面罩卡扣断裂导致盖板意外打开

自有案例

2023年3月,有飞机反映5700米下降时35ABC座椅上方氧气面罩盖板意外打开,核实氧气发生器未触发,与机组了解当时无颠簸或其他异常状况,过站依据MEL35-02放行(粘贴防火胶带),禁用35ABC座椅。航后检查发现PSU盖板卡扣有断裂,盖板无法安装平齐,更换PSU。

737MAX前起落架漏油导致定中问题

外部案例

2023年3月8日一架注册为C-FHCM的Westjet波音737-8 MAX从纽约肯尼迪机场(美国)飞往加拿大卡尔加里的WS-1681航班,载有165名乘客和6名机组人员,在起飞转弯过程中,机组人员听到前起落架发出异响,在离开了肯尼迪机场04L跑道。在离地收起落架后,前起落架指示异常,机组在7000英尺按检查单处置后,解决了这个问题,继续飞往卡尔加里。Westjet Dispatch在预计着陆前约一小时通知卡尔加里机场前起落架问题。在向卡尔加里降落时,机组人员宣布PAN PAN,并告知他们计划在跑道上停车,需要被拖到停机坪。这架飞机安全降落在卡尔加里的17L跑道上,并能够依靠自己的动力滑行到停机坪。

加拿大TSB报道称,“前起落架压力密封件在起飞滚转过程中发生故障。油舱内的压力损失使支柱受到压缩,无法在收入起落架舱之前定中。密封件被更换,SDR被提交给加拿大运输部。飞机被放行继续投入运营。”

经了解机组在收起落架时出现红灯亮,地面检查时发现减震支柱漏油,无镜面。检查与门封严发生了剐蹭。AHM监控到AIR/GND SYS信息,并有32-01102 “PSEU NOSE GEAR ON GROUND PROXIMITY SENSOR IS TARGET NEAR IN AIR”代码。更换了动静封严和受损的门封严。

点评:故障表象与冬季前起镜面到底的经验类似,有开发监控。

A Westjet Boeing 737-8 MAX, registration C-FHCM performing flight WS-1681 from New York JFK,NY (USA) to Calgary,AB (Canada) with 165 passengers and 6 crew, departed JFK’s runway 04L when during the takeoff roll the crew heard unusual noises from the nose gear. After becoming airborne and selecting the gear up an abnormal indication for the nose gear followed prompting the crew to level off at 7000 feet while troubleshooting the issue. The crew was able to resolve the indication and continued the flight to Calgary. Westjet Dispatch informed Calgary Airport about the nose gear issue about one hour prior to estimated landing. Descending towards Calgary the crew declared PAN PAN and advised they were planning to stop on the runway and needed to be towed to the apron. The aircraft landed safely on Calgary’s runway 17L and was able to taxi to the apron on its own power.

The Canadian TSB reported, that “the nose landing gear pressure seals failed during the takeoff roll. Loss of pressure in the oleo kept the strut compressed and unable to center before retracting into the gear well. The seals were replaced and an SDR was submitted to Transport Canada. The aircraft was released for continued service.”

737MAX主轮爆胎

外部案例

2023年3月28日,一架Flydubai波音737-9 MAX,注册号A6-FNC,执行从迪拜(阿拉伯联合酋长国)飞往马累(马尔代夫)的FZ-1569航班,在马累的36号跑道上降落时,两个右侧主轮胎都爆裂了。原因跟进中。

ncident: Flydubai B39M at Male on Mar 28th 2023, burst tyres on landing
By Simon Hradecky, created Tuesday, Mar 28th 2023 13:52Z, last updated Tuesday, Mar 28th 2023 13:52Z
A Flydubai Boeing 737-9 MAX, registration A6-FNC performing flight FZ-1569 from Dubai (United Arab Emirates) to Male (Maldives), landed on Male’s runway 36 when both right hand main tyres burst. The aircraft rolled out without further incident, came to a stop on the runway and was disabled.

[ Back To Top ]