737MAX前起落架漏油导致定中问题

外部案例

2023年3月8日一架注册为C-FHCM的Westjet波音737-8 MAX从纽约肯尼迪机场(美国)飞往加拿大卡尔加里的WS-1681航班,载有165名乘客和6名机组人员,在起飞转弯过程中,机组人员听到前起落架发出异响,在离开了肯尼迪机场04L跑道。在离地收起落架后,前起落架指示异常,机组在7000英尺按检查单处置后,解决了这个问题,继续飞往卡尔加里。Westjet Dispatch在预计着陆前约一小时通知卡尔加里机场前起落架问题。在向卡尔加里降落时,机组人员宣布PAN PAN,并告知他们计划在跑道上停车,需要被拖到停机坪。这架飞机安全降落在卡尔加里的17L跑道上,并能够依靠自己的动力滑行到停机坪。

加拿大TSB报道称,“前起落架压力密封件在起飞滚转过程中发生故障。油舱内的压力损失使支柱受到压缩,无法在收入起落架舱之前定中。密封件被更换,SDR被提交给加拿大运输部。飞机被放行继续投入运营。”

经了解机组在收起落架时出现红灯亮,地面检查时发现减震支柱漏油,无镜面。检查与门封严发生了剐蹭。AHM监控到AIR/GND SYS信息,并有32-01102 “PSEU NOSE GEAR ON GROUND PROXIMITY SENSOR IS TARGET NEAR IN AIR”代码。更换了动静封严和受损的门封严。

点评:故障表象与冬季前起镜面到底的经验类似,有开发监控。

A Westjet Boeing 737-8 MAX, registration C-FHCM performing flight WS-1681 from New York JFK,NY (USA) to Calgary,AB (Canada) with 165 passengers and 6 crew, departed JFK’s runway 04L when during the takeoff roll the crew heard unusual noises from the nose gear. After becoming airborne and selecting the gear up an abnormal indication for the nose gear followed prompting the crew to level off at 7000 feet while troubleshooting the issue. The crew was able to resolve the indication and continued the flight to Calgary. Westjet Dispatch informed Calgary Airport about the nose gear issue about one hour prior to estimated landing. Descending towards Calgary the crew declared PAN PAN and advised they were planning to stop on the runway and needed to be towed to the apron. The aircraft landed safely on Calgary’s runway 17L and was able to taxi to the apron on its own power.

The Canadian TSB reported, that “the nose landing gear pressure seals failed during the takeoff roll. Loss of pressure in the oleo kept the strut compressed and unable to center before retracting into the gear well. The seals were replaced and an SDR was submitted to Transport Canada. The aircraft was released for continued service.”

737MAX主轮爆胎

外部案例

2023年3月28日,一架Flydubai波音737-9 MAX,注册号A6-FNC,执行从迪拜(阿拉伯联合酋长国)飞往马累(马尔代夫)的FZ-1569航班,在马累的36号跑道上降落时,两个右侧主轮胎都爆裂了。原因跟进中。

ncident: Flydubai B39M at Male on Mar 28th 2023, burst tyres on landing
By Simon Hradecky, created Tuesday, Mar 28th 2023 13:52Z, last updated Tuesday, Mar 28th 2023 13:52Z
A Flydubai Boeing 737-9 MAX, registration A6-FNC performing flight FZ-1569 from Dubai (United Arab Emirates) to Male (Maldives), landed on Male’s runway 36 when both right hand main tyres burst. The aircraft rolled out without further incident, came to a stop on the runway and was disabled.

737MAX水平安定面配平故障

外部航司案例

1、2023年1月21日,美国航空公司的波音737-8 MAX,注册号N306SW,执行从佛罗里达州迈阿密飞往牙买加金斯敦的AA-2692航班,在从7000英尺的高度,准备爬升到16000英尺时。反应出现水平安定面配平故障,机组返航,排故更换了水平安定面马达;


2,、2023年3月1日,美西南波音737-8 MAX,注册号N8844Q,执行WN-971航班,从亚利桑那州凤凰城飞往德克萨斯州休斯顿霍比,在11000英尺高度时,反应水平安定面自动配平和电配平失效,机组人工配平,返航凤凰城。排故更换了水平安定面配平马达的跳开关。

从两起事件看,美西南的跳开关故障是机队极少发生的偶发事件。而美国航空的水平安定面马达故障,是737的一类典型故障。EATON公司生产的这一系列马达,从737NG机队表现看,可靠性并不高,波音发布737MAX-FTD-27-20001和737NG-FTD-27-20001对其可靠性做过讨论,改进的研究工作仍在进行中。局方也曾发布《关于B737NG飞机安定面配平马达可靠性问题的风险提示》,要求提高航材备件,加强机组沟通等要求。


就诱发737MAX停飞的MCAS系统而言,水平安定面马达是执行机构,而事故本身是由于FCC软件逻辑导致的水平安定面持续低头,在经过AD改装后,该逻辑已经得到了纠正。与这两起事件有着本质上的差异。

就水平安定面马达电配失效后,QRH并无特别的要求,为机组转人工作动。从机队历史看,较多机组是采用这一方式。

737MAX执行737-SL-21-147纠正措施时的问题

外部案例

有客户在执行SL 737-SL-21-147时发现管路干扰。建议的维护措施已用尽,但仍无法解决问题。更换较长的紧固件似乎是唯一的选择。波音公司认为,使用螺钉和垫片作为永久性维修是可以接受的。波音公司还确认,可以使用更长的螺钉/垫片来防后续飞机上的纠正。

Question:

Customer found tube interference when performing SL 737-SL-21-147. Recommended maintenance dispositions were exhausted but still could not solve the issue. Replacing by longer fasteners seems to be the only option.

Answer: •Boeing finds it acceptable to use the screws and spacers as a permanent repair. •This response is limited to this Service Request and should not be thought of as a blanket approval for all potential applications or substitutions. • •The repair was considered minor with RDR grant • •Boeing also confirms that the longer screws/spacers can be used to prevent the subject riding condition on future aircraft.

737MAX飞机顶起状态下MFD页面抑制

外部案例

有反应报告说,当飞机在顶起状态处于“空中”状态时。当“在空中”时,客户发现MFD功能被禁用,因此无法进入MFD和工作步骤,客户怀疑在任务之前应该有其他步骤,先使用PSEU并将a/c置于“地面”状态。波音表示MFD维护功能不可进入,当飞机在空中状态时。波音拟对对施工步骤程序做调整,以满足在顶升时,可以执行操作测试。

Question:

“…reported that when a/c on jack and the a/c is “in air”. When “in air”, customer found that the MFD function is inhibited, so they cannot enter MFD, and the work step…, customer suspects there should be other steps before the task, to use PSEU and put a/c “on ground”.”

Answer:

Boeing confirms that the MFD maintenance function is not accessible while the airplane is on jacks due to being “in air” mode.

Boeing advises customer to perform the operational test while not on jacks at this time while Boeing re-evaluates the procedure while on jacks. Boeing will send a follow-on message when an updated procedure for the operational test on jacks is available.

[ Back To Top ]