737脚蹬调节钢索断裂

2022年1月,机队首例737脚蹬调节钢索断裂的案例,为早期引进的5*82飞机。机龄为60012FH和35727CY,钢索件号30-1565,断裂位置如下图所示,接近于下部CRANK INSTL的位置。从断头看,内部偏黑,时间较长,外层较新,为瞬断痕迹。与波音做了沟通,SR 4-5331125010。波音表示审查了BCS数据库,发现极少有关于方向舵踏板调整钢索故障的报告,其中一些报告的位置与本案的位置相似。钢索的断裂是由疲劳引起的。电缆在距离后端约5.5英寸处断裂,这和钢索头出来后向右弯曲点是存在一致性的。该钢索没有MPD检查项目或操作测试。是因为飞行机组在飞行前调整舵踏板时,经常使用舵踏板调整。此时,机组人员应注意任何异常情况。

补充与调节钢索相关的一个737-SL-27-185-A,737NG线号在16 到1690之间的飞机,安装的钢索钢索转轴件号为30-1565-3,这个钢索长度为92INCH,与767通用。在使用到737NG飞机后,有部分飞机反应过转动力偏大的情况。波音在线号1691之后的飞机使用了96INCH长度的钢索转轴,件号为30-1565。波音在工厂的试验表示使用加长的钢索转轴后,操作上更顺滑了一些,建议如果在实际运行中,有机组反应存在操作困难的时候,可以核实钢索转轴件号,如为30-1565-3,可以考虑进行替换。

同时波音提出,不是所有的操作力大都是由于钢索转轴导致的,尤其是在最前和最后的极限位置的时候。

工时方面,波音给出了更换转轴钢索需要30工时。

737大翼封严的损伤标准

2022年1月机队出现运行中克鲁格襟翼损伤的问题,一线提出了标准判定的问题,此前和波音做过沟通,SR3-5126464525。对于损伤原因损坏,波音认为与活动部件相关的正常磨损项目、飞行过程中的正常振动或运动以及基于飞行控制校装的异常磨损。

对于标准,波音提出的标准如下。

In general, if any portion or length of a typical non-metallic bulb or blade seal is damaged (worn, split, frayed) and installed (not missing) and the seal is still performing its intended function, there is no requirement to apply the CDL (if available) or replace the seal. If the seal length is altered (a portion removed), the configuration has been changed and an appropriate CDL should be applied (if available) or the seal should be replaced. We would review repairs on a case-by-case basis. As there are no damage tolerances published in the AMM, HNA could consider defining or categorizing seal damage ‘in-house’ to clarify if such a seal is meeting its intended function. Damage could be categorized in the following fashion:

Category 1: Damage that affects only the surface of the seal without penetrating the outer cloth. This damage can be left as is permanently. This damage does not affect the functionality of the seal. The CDL would not apply.

Category 2: Damage that is up to .25″ wide by 1 inch in length that does not fully penetrate the seal wall can be left as is until the next C-Check. This damage does not affect the functionality of the seal. The CDL would not apply.

Category 3: Damage that is up to .25″ wide by 2 inches in length that does not fully penetrate the seal wall can be left as is until the next A-Check. Regular inspections should be performed at intervals of 10 to 20 Flight Cycles to ensure that the seal does not become fully penetrated or exceed the given criteria.

部分737NG轮毂被误刻MAX标识

由于737NG碳刹车构型轮毂与737MAX轮毂件号相同,只不过在胎皮使用上,NG用的是斜交而MAX用的是子午。为免混装,在轮毂件号上有所区分,MAX在原件号后部刻上了MAX的后缀。2022年1月,近期在NG机队中发现有使用带有MAX后缀标识的轮毂。经过调查发现SAP系统中,这些件依旧录入的为原件号。进一步调查,问题发生在某一修理厂,进场时均默认将轮毂刻上MAX的标识。被发现错误后,又使用白漆予以遮盖,但遮盖的白漆长期使用和维护后掉漆,是MAX后缀又显现出来。为免此类轮毂进入机队造成构型管理混乱,增加误装风险。按该厂的出厂产品序号进行了清查,累计发现3个产品存在误刻。已拆下,进场进行打磨处理。

[ Back To Top ]