辖区某公司在进行机载计算机安装架固定锁扣检查时发现，该公司部分B737NG 机型13 架飞机存在座舱压力控制器组件（CPC）挂钩（T-HOOK）与锁扣保持器（BACC10HZ1）不匹配（见
图1），挂钩不能卡入锁扣保持器卡槽，存在挂钩脱离锁扣的安全风险，且存在部分原装机锁扣与IPC 件号不一致的情况。该公司就此情况向波音询问，波音公司建议使用件号为BACC10HZ2 的锁扣来替换件号为BACC10HZ1 的锁扣（见图2）。
BACC10HZ1应该都是这个样子，仅这个厂家：7187-3922-103-101 (Hollingsead)的锁扣有影响。
CCAR121.333.E(3)为了对那些由于生理上的原因，在从飞行高度 7600 米（25000 英尺）以上的座舱气压高度下降后可能需要纯氧的机上乘员进行急救护理，在座舱失密后座舱气压高度 2400 米(8000 英尺)以上的整个飞行时间内，应当为 2％的乘员 （但在任何情况下不得少于 1 人）提供符合《运输类飞机适航标准》（CCAR25）第 25.1443 条的氧气源。
换算过来就是：
1) 0<乘员人数≤50, 需手提氧气瓶数量 1 个；
2) 51≤乘员人数≤100, 需手提氧气瓶数量 2 个；
3) 101≤乘员人数≤150，需手提氧气瓶数量 3 个；
4) 151≤乘员人数≤200，需手提氧气瓶数量 4 个。
外部案例
有反应报告说，当飞机在顶起状态处于“空中”状态时。当“在空中”时，客户发现MFD功能被禁用，因此无法进入MFD和工作步骤，客户怀疑在任务之前应该有其他步骤，先使用PSEU并将a/c置于“地面”状态。波音表示MFD维护功能不可进入，当飞机在空中状态时。波音拟对对施工步骤程序做调整，以满足在顶升时，可以执行操作测试。
Question:
“…reported that when a/c on jack and the a/c is “in air”. When “in air”, customer found that the MFD function is inhibited, so they cannot enter MFD, and the work step…, customer suspects there should be other steps before the task, to use PSEU and put a/c “on ground”.”
Answer:
Boeing confirms that the MFD maintenance function is not accessible while the airplane is on jacks due to being “in air” mode.
Boeing advises customer to perform the operational test while not on jacks at this time while Boeing re-evaluates the procedure while on jacks. Boeing will send a follow-on message when an updated procedure for the operational test on jacks is available.
SR 4-5728189142
如果轮胎的压力测量值低于165 psig，则如果在过载的情况下滚动，则相邻轮胎发生故障（胎面损失或胎体破裂）的可能性非常高，特别是如果低轮胎在长滑行距离或高速操作（如起飞或着陆）期间处于低压。我们认为唯一可以接受的情况是，如果可以确定飞机没有在高速或长距离低轮胎情况下滚动，则安装相邻轮胎。如果可以保证飞机没有转弯，也没有高速滚动或轮胎气压低的长距离飞行，那么波音公司对不更换轮胎组件和车轴的另一侧没有技术异议。但是，如果怀疑是否满足上述条件，则应谨慎地拆下车轴上的两个轮胎总成。
If pressure of a tire is measured below 165 psig, then the likelihood of the adjacent tire failing (tread loss or carcass rupture) is very high if rolled while overloaded, especially if the low tire was at a low pressure for long taxi distances or during high speed operations such as a takeoffs or landings. The only situation where we would consider it acceptable to leave the adjacent tire installed is if it was known for sure that the airplane did not roll at high speed or for long distances with a low tire. If it can be assured that the aircraft did not turn, nor rolled at a high speed or for long distances with low tire pressure, then Boeing has No Technical Objection to not replacing the tire assembly and on the other side of the axle. However, if there is doubt the above conditions are met, it would be prudent to remove both tire assemblies on the axle.
点评：基本上无法有效的进行核实。
